Cart

There are no products in your shopping cart.

Latest

 

By Angie Mabry-Nauta

Our culture values "powering through" to get the job done—but at what expense? Read More
 

By Evelyn Anne Clausen

Why one woman diagnosed with bipolar disorder continues to claim her identity as “a new creation in Christ.” Read More
 

By Erina K. Ludwig

Erina Ludwig writes about health care in terms of the Christian call to care for the least of these. Read More

 

For years, Australia's population of endangered Tasmanian devils has been significantly diminished by deadly facial tumors. Now, scientists have mapped the Tasmanian devil's genome—and they believe their findings can help them not only eradicate the tumors, but also better understand human cancers.

While human cancers change quickly, the Tasmanian devils' facial tumors evolve slowly so scientists can track the process and understand what causes them. Discuss

 

After a week of coming under fire for pulling and then reinstating funding for Planned Parenthood, the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation is now under the microscope for their financial details. One factor that has surfaced is that in the last few years, the amount of fundraising money spent on grants given to scientists looking for the causes and cure for breast cancer has been cut in half. In 2008, 29 percent of donations went to research awards—in 2011, that number dropped to 15 percent.

Komen is commended in other areas of their financials, though, especially in terms of the salary given its president, Nancy Brinker. She received $417,712 in 2011, which is $300,000 less than what the Breast Cancer Research Foundation reported in salary and benefits for its president the same year.

In terms of where their money goes in the research realm, Komen is receiving less criticism in terms of dollar amounts and more about where those dollars are going.

From the Reuters article:

Some experts who applaud Komen for supporting research are critical less of the "how much" than the "what." They say funding choices may place too great an emphasis on treatment and the most basic of basic research, rather than prevention and a true cure.

"It would be good if they spent more on finding the cause of breast cancer and preventing it," said breast surgeon and author Susan Love, whose eponymous research foundation focuses on raising "an army of women" to volunteer for breast-cancer studies.

"They fund a lot of research on mice and rats and cell lines," she said. "But rats and mice don't get breast cancer; you have to give it to them." Discuss

 

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation, one of the largest nonprofits fighting breast cancer, announced yesterday that they will no longer give funding to Planned Parenthood. In response, Planned Parenthood accused the foundation of giving into political pressure.

Planned Parenthood is currently under investigation for allegedly using federal dollars for abortions, and anti-abortion groups have recently targeted Komen for its connection with Planned Parenthood.

Support from Komen—including the $650,000 they granted to Planned Parenthood last year—has helped at least 170,000 women receive breast cancer exams in the past five years through the organization. Discuss