The Most Misused Biblical Term

The most misused biblical term today is “Kingdom.” 

One of my college students told me her sister was not working in the
Church but was doing “Kingdom” work and “justice” work at a social
service. Another student explained to me she was joining hands with a
local inter-faith group to further peace. She called it “Kingdom” work
and added, “It has nothing to do with the Church.” There’s a common
theme here: the “Kingdom” is bigger and better than the “Church.”

We are using this word, “Kingdom,” both to cut out things we don’t
like—evangelism and church—and to cast a vision for what we do
like—justice and compassion. But it’s time to give this word “Kingdom” a
fresh look, because we’re misusing it.

The word “kingdom” comes from Jesus, and so to Him and His Jewish
world we must go. It was impossible in Jesus’ world to say “kingdom” and
not think “king.” Either the word “king” referred to Caesar, the
empire-building, worship-me-or-die emperor of Rome, or it referred to
Israel’s hoped-for King, the Messiah. When Jesus said Kingdom, He meant
the Messiah is the one true King and Caesar is not.

Furthermore, a first-century Jew couldn’t say “Kingdom” or “King”
without also thinking of “Kingdom people” (or citizen-followers of the
Messiah). The most unusual of people were Jesus’ Kingdom people—sinners,
tax collectors, fishermen, hookers, demonized women and ordinary, poor
Galileans. Jesus invited people to the place of Kingdom living and said
anyone who was willing to turn from sins and injustice and economic
exploitation and accumulation would find forgiveness and fellowship and
freedom. So every evening, when Jesus decided to eat with His followers,
He attracted a crowd, He told stories (parables) of what the Kingdom
was like and He asked His listeners to join the movement. That table of
fellowship embodied both who was following Jesus (or at least hearing
Him out), and how they were to love one another in concrete deeds.

That was the Kingdom’s launch in Jesus’ day: King Jesus and His people sitting at a table telling stories.

But Jesus’ vision of Kingdom was even bigger than that. A scribe once
asked Jesus a restrictive question: “Who is my neighbor?” But he meant,
“What are the boundaries between God’s people (my neighbor) and all the
rest?” Jesus turned that man inside out and told him the right question
was, “To whom will you be neighborly?” Jesus’ answer was: “Anyone you
meet. Especially the needy.” Jesus converted the restrictive question
into an inclusive habit. Those who live out that inclusive habit are
Kingdom people. King Jesus came to create a Kingdom people, and His
Kingdom people are those who listen to Him and live out His Kingdom
vision. They know His words and they abide in His words.

There’s a third element about what Kingdom means for Jesus. Kingdoms
only work well when they have a constitution. The Jews of Jesus’ day
called it “Torah.” Jesus swallowed up Israel’s Torah into His Kingdom
vision—and it broke loose one day when He was teaching His disciples. We
call it the Sermon on the Mount. This is the Torah for followers of
King Jesus.

The biggest problem with the Church for many is that the people they
know who go there don’t follow Jesus. Which is the exact reason why so
many today want to disconnect Kingdom from Church: Too often a church
looks like anything but the Kingdom because too many so-called Kingdom
people don’t follow Jesus!

Christians need to sit down with the gospels, read them and compare
the themes of Jesus’ Kingdom vision with the themes of many local
churches.

I wish we would all dig in all over again and construct new
foundations for a Kingdom vision of the Church. A church embodies 
themes like love, justice, peace and wisdom. The Kingdom church will not
only talk about such themes, but will be a society marked by a Gospel
justice, a Gospel peace and a Gospel wisdom. It will be a people who eat
together, love one another and who see the needs in the world around
them and do something about those needs. According to Jesus, a local
church is designed to be a local fellowship of Kingdom people who love
and follow King Jesus.

Instead of choosing either the Church or the Kingdom, Christians are
called to see church as a living manifestation of the Kingdom.

I see a freshness about this in churches all around the world,
churches devoted to being a community that serves the community, a
fellowship that loves the neighbor, a church that cares for the poor and
a society that is the fertile ground for a completely new society—the
Kingdom society of Jesus.

Scot McKnight is the Karl A. Olsson Professor in Religious Studies at North Park University. This article originally appeared in RELEVANT. To read more articles like this, you can subscribe by clicking here.

5 Comments

Jeff Goins

228

Jeff Goins commented…

interesting. it's certainly a catchphrase being used by a lot of 20-somethings. i like how Dallas Willard defines churches in Renovation of the heart: "beachheads of the Kingdom of God."

85,019

Stan Nussbaum commented…

Dead right. I'd add it is also the most misleading word in English Bible translations. The "kingdom of heaven" is neither heaven nor heavenly ideals. It's the power that radiates from the King of heaven and changes those who welcome it. The split of church and kingdom only occurs because so many people in our churches have "accepted Jesus as Savior" without having a clue that they were welcoming this transforming power, throwing their lives open to the overwhelming influence of the risen Messiah.

85,019

vervain commented…

I was with you all the way through your informalexegesis of the parable of the good Samaritan (nailed it, IMHO). But your conclusion islittle differentthan your students'--which you seemed to set outto modify. If, as you say, we should "construct new foundations for a Kingdom vision of the Church," based on "a Gospel justice, a Gospel peace and a Gospel wisdom," how is that different from your students' take on things?

Freely acknowledging thatcertain aspects of Christ's message are, perhaps,too little satisfied, I still find misplaced the current push to emphasize love asmaterial "help,""justice" asspreadingmaterial things, "peace" as accepting the loosest prevalent values, etc. etc. That, I think, is what your students are doing--perhaps without knowing it---and I hoped that you were going to carefully distinguish their approach from the Gospel.

I think that Jesus taught an individual salvation-- in other words, that each must come to terms with the truth of their own sinfulness and His solitary provision of redemption. A fruit of the humility that accompanies this realization is religious or pious acts, a primary one beingadopting the "be a neighbor"instruction of the Good Samaritan.Neither Jesus nor Paul nor any apostle advocated the "universal community"that is likely your students' "Kingdom" --- a community that demandsmassmaterial transfers anda shallow "acceptance" of all philosophies of life, modes of living and practices.Jesus and the apostles taught private, informed sharing among Christians,based on the ideathat it was better to give than receive--i.e., that no one should always be a receiver. It sounds like the "kingdom" your students embrace is aChristianizing term for a system based on creating and fomenting envy and a sense of "deserving" that is completely foreign to the Gospel.

85,019

Bobolambert commented…

Please log in or register to comment

Log In