Login/Register

Our Latest Tweet

Slices Categories

Friend Activity

Current Issue

The Fray

The multiplatinum band talks faith, doubt and how a trip to Africa changed their lives.

Discover Your Calling

Sometimes, the hardest part about figuring out what to do with your life is figuring out what you even want.

Anthony Bourdain

The chef, author and TV personality on his new show, his daughter and what makes him tick.

Plus, Phantogram, Winning the War on Religion, David Crowder, Did Kony 2012 Work? and much more!

Get our top articles and featured content delivered to your inbox every Tuesday!

A pair of British scientists have advocated for "post-birth abortions," which is just what it sounds like: terminating a baby after he or she is born. Pro-life proponents have loudly decried the paper advocating for the procedure, and there hasn't yet been a public response from pro-choice groups, likely because "post-birth abortion" is literally the stupidest, most evil thing ever ...

From NBC-DFW:

Two Oxford bioethicists caused an outcry among pro-lifers when they argued that “after-birth abortion” — killing a newborn baby — is morally sound and should be made legal.

Alberto Giubilini from the University of Milan and Francesca Minerva from Melbourne University wrote in the Journal of Medical Ethics that fetuses and newborns “do not have the same moral status as actual persons.”

The pair argue say that killing a baby should be “permissible in all cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled,” adding that “the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant.”

Read More


blog comments powered by Disqus