By Melissa Kircher
April 18, 2012
Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. (Ephesians 5:22-33, NIV)
I can already hear the frustrated sighs and harrumphs at the very mention of this passage. These verses have been picked apart for years by pastors, scholars and theologians.
I am, however, none of those things. I am a woman and a wife, and these verses are important for me to understand. As someone who has a deep relationship with Christ, I can’t simply ignore the parts of the Bible that make me uncomfortable. So, what do I do with this passage about submission?
I read the whole thing—and I read it in context.
The same Greek word Paul uses for submission concerning wives in verse 22 is used earlier in verse 21 when he’s describing all relationships. "Submit" was a Greek military term meaning "to arrange [troop divisions] in a military fashion under the command of a leader." In non-military use, it was "a voluntary attitude of giving in, cooperating, assuming responsibility and carrying a burden.”
Look, I’m not trying to say these verses aren’t controversial, nor am I trying to twist them to fit some agenda. What I am saying is all this bickering about the specificity of wordings is missing the point. The passage as a whole is addressing mutual submission within a marriage relationship.
Maybe we get stuck trying to pick apart semantics because neither husbands nor wives want to admit the Bible calls both of us to submit. In her book Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love, Dr. Sue Johnson states most spouses get stuck in what she calls “Demon Dialogues.” These are circular arguments where, she says, “Couples cannot connect safely with [their] partner. [They are] dead-end patterns of mutual blame that effectively keep a couple miles part, blocking reengagement and the creation of a safe haven.” When we get stuck in these Demon Dialogues, neither spouse is submitting. We are digging in our heels and staunchly defending our own positions, mindful of only our feelings.
Maybe the Bible knows what it’s talking about, then.
Dr. Johnson goes on to suggest married adults need to have the same kind of emotional bond that parents and children have. In fact, having this bond is crucial for the survival of the marriage. She says, “Forget about learning how to argue better, analyzing your early childhood, making grand romantic gestures, or experimenting with new sexual positions. Instead, recognize and admit that you are emotionally attached and dependent on your partner … for nurturing, soothing, and protection. Adult attachments may be more reciprocal and less centered on physical contact, but the nature of the emotional bond is the same. [We should] focus on creating and strengthening this emotional bond and by identifying and transforming the key moments that foster an adult loving relationship: being open, attuned, and responsive to each other.”I don’t know about you, but if my husband were always open, attuned and responsive to me, he’d definitely be submitting. And vice versa. If we could both do this all the time, our marriage would be awesome.
Sadly, the beginning verses of this Ephesians passage have been used by husbands to oppress wives—to make them feel less intellectual, capable and equal. Even in Baker’s Commentary of the Bible, it says a husband should not “burden the wife with the decision-making responsibility … but rather make decisions according to her needs and welfare, even when it means making a decision she may not like.”
I disagree wholeheartedly with this interpretation. It just doesn’t make a good marriage when one person is the decision-maker. My husband and I make decisions based on mutual submission (which I believe is supported by the verses in Ephesians) and on prayer. If we can’t agree, we put off making the decision indefinitely. We take the time to ask for God’s guidance, talk it through and consider the other person’s opinion. And we always end up in agreement, even if one or both of us have changed our minds along the way.
When this passage in verse 23 says the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the Church, my mind immediately goes to 1 Corinthians 12:21, which says, “The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I don’t need you!’ And the head cannot say to the feet, ‘I don’t need you!’” God very pointedly directs the Church body to work together and makes it clear that no one part is better than the other; all the parts deserve equal honor and consideration. Isn’t that what Ephesians is talking about?
Despite how the word “submit” has been abused over the years, it actually isn’t negative. It’s a picture of joyful, freeing, healthy Christian living. In its purest application, the word draws us out of ourselves into thinking about other people, loving them, listening to them and putting their needs ahead of our own. "Submit" only becomes a negative command when it’s one-sided. When the wife submits but the husband doesn’t. When the husband submits but the wife doesn’t. That’s where things get all screwed up. Both the husband and wife are called by God to be submissive to each other.
Men and women are different. They don't always experience love in the same way, and so the Bible sometimes gives gender-based remarks for how to best treat one's spouse. The fact that Ephesians lumps the expectations together is a big deal. Marriage is to be done as a team. We work together, sacrifice for one another and submit to the needs of each other. We're different but equal.
And for me, this is what this passage is all about. It's the way a marriage partnership works, the way God wants it to be healthy and life-giving for both husband and wife. Marriage takes the submission of selfish will; there is no way around it. Husband or wife, you will be challenged daily to have your mate’s best interests at heart … when all you really want is to have your own way.
I trust that when God gives me commands about my marriage relationship, He has my best interests at heart, even when the things He tells me to do are difficult. Christ submitted to the Father’s will out of love, not forced obedience. That is what God wants for a marriage—for husband and wife to lovingly submit to one another and create a bonded, secure partnership.
Melissa Kircher, along with her husband, Jake, write about relationships and marriage at www.holymessofmarriage.com. You can also follow them on Twitter @marriageismessy.



160 Comments
81,204
Red commented…
I'll differ your question to Dr. Bilezikian.http://www.cbeinternational.or...
81,204
Red commented…
The reason people link those verses together is due to the Greek syntax. There is no verb present in verse 22; it is implied from the previous verse. That's not an interpretative that egalitarians hold; it's how everyone understands the verse. That's how a Greek reader would have understood it.
I see no mention of government authority in 1 Peter 3:1-7. To what are youreferring?
If you are still curious about these passages and why people "tickle their brains" over such issues, check out these articles:http://www.cbeinternational.or.... Blessings.
81,204
Tyler Hernandez commented…
the verses on submitting to governmental authority comes directly before in 1 Peter 2:13.
I guess I don't see how the verb is absent in "Wives, submit to your husbands" in verse 22. The verb seems clearly to be in the word 'submit'. But maybe I am missing something.
It remains unclear to me how one can reliably link these two verses since verse 21 is talking about how to be filled with the holy spirit and verse 22 and onward is talking about what submission and authority looks like, not just in marriage but also in parenting and slavery relationships.
I can see how one can say that verses 22 and on simply extrapolate on verse 21 by explaining just how we are to "submit to one another out of reverence for christ" but the doctrine of mutual submission is nowhere to be found in my view.
81,204
Chuckjnlj commented…
Take it in context. Woman must submit only to her husband. She's not supposed to have relations with half the church. You gotta remember that in those days men were allowed to have more than one wife and a few concubines (wife-level 2). Those wives must have a relationship with just that man, however. This was written for the era it is presented.
81,204
Chuckjnlj commented…
Crimey: where did someone come up with "
The tricky part is defining what "head" means." Geeze. Is it that hard? The head of the home? it doesn't mean boss??!! Like the pastor is the 'head' of the church (the body); the man is the 'head' of his home. There has to be a final decision maker in business, a team, or a home. Why stress so much in making something simple so difficult.
Connect OR Connect
Please log in or register to comment