Shades of Gray

How much is too much when it comes to consuming culture?

Two Christians walk into a bar. One of them passes out tracts with hopes of saving some heathens from hell-bound paths to certain ruin. The other sits at the bar and orders a beer, with hopes of drinking the night—and a week full of sorrows—away. The former believes “secular” culture (bars, movies, basically anything that can’t be purchased at Hobby Lobby) is evil and to be avoided. The latter doesn’t believe in the “sacred/secular” distinction at all, seeing everything in culture as fair game for the Christian (as much as it is for anyone else).

When it comes to how we engage and consume culture, Christians far too often have defaulted to one of these two extreme approaches. You’re likely familiar with both of them.

The Legalists are the Christians who see culture mostly in terms of liability: how it can damage us, taint our witness, lead us down a slippery slope. This mentality leads to the boycotting of Spongebob Squarepants, the picketing of Martin Scorsese films, the ritual burning of Led Zeppelin records at youth camp (the horror!). It’s the approach that claims Harry Potter is Wiccan propaganda, Million Dollar Baby is a defense of euthanasia and P.O.D.’s version of “Bullet the Blue Sky” is OK for Christian radio but U2’s version is not. It’s a philosophy of strict separation, wherein “Christian” labeled alternatives (Amish romance novels) are harmless but everything else (non-Amish romance novels) is worldly and dangerous.

The ambiguity of a “Christian” approach to culture ... should beckon us to go deeper.

The Libertines are the Christians who were either raised by Legalists or used to be one, and thus are now pushing as far away from that attitude as they can, often in as conspicuous a manner as possible. They are the Christians who intentionally subvert “evangelical morals” by holding Bible studies in brewery taprooms or dropping the F-word frequently on their Christian college campus. They smoke (cloves, hookah, pipes, cigars, Parliaments, even pot), drink (usually craft beer), and celebrate the TV-MA shock value of shows like Girls and Game of Thrones. Theirs is a philosophy of no separation. They have purged their vocabulary of words like “worldliness,” “holiness” or “secular,” opting to approach the realm of culture with an arms-wide-open acceptance of anything and everything that brings pleasure or entertainment.

Among the many things the divergent paths of the Legalists and Libertines demonstrate is this unfortunate fact: Christians have a hard time with nuance. Gray areas are not our strong suit. This is unfortunate because while there are some clear-cut do’s and don’ts in Scripture, there are many areas where it’s just not very black and white.

Culture, and what we partake or abstain from within culture, is one such gray area. There aren’t easy answers in the Bible about whether this or that HBO show is OK to watch or whether it’s appropriate for Christians to enjoy the music of Tyler, the Creator. Scripture contains no comprehensive list of acceptable films, books or websites. Contrary to what some Christians maintain, the Bible neither endorses nor forbids many things that we wish it were more clear about.

But the ambiguity of a “Christian” approach to culture should not lead us to throw up our hands and default to the easier, black-and-white positions described above. Rather, it should beckon us to go deeper, to ask questions, to truly wrestle with what it means to be a Christian consumer of culture.

Five Questions for the Discerning Consumer

For Christians interested in consuming culture in the thoughtful, edifying and ultimately God-glorifying middle ground between extreme legalism and extreme libertinism, the following questions may help. Before you buy a new album, movie ticket, magazine or any other of the thousands of cultural items we regularly consume, consider asking yourself these questions:

1. Does it point me toward God? Every moment of our lives should be an opportunity to worship God. In whatever we eat, drink, watch, play or listen to, we should strive to do it to the glory of God (1 Corinthians 10:31). It doesn’t have to be “churchy” to be worship and it doesn’t have to be a praise song to be God-honoring, but given all the things we could spend our time enjoying or consuming, why not choose that which points us toward God? Often, this simply requires a shift in our thinking—to start approaching cultural consumption actively rather than passively, seeking out the goodness and truth within it rather than taking it at face value. When we start looking at culture in a deeper way, the bounds of what can facilitate our worship are greatly expanded.

2. Would Jesus consume it? OK, I know the WWJD thing is overplayed, but if, as Christians, we are called to follow after Christ and “be imitators” (Ephesians 5:1) of Him, then it’s an appropriate question to ask. And it’s not just about whether we can envision Jesus putting on headphones and enjoying the music of Radiohead (though I think He might), as much as whether we would feel ashamed if Jesus took a gander at our iTunes libraries. After all, our ears, eyes and bodies are not our own. They were bought at a price. They belong to Jesus. We are called to be “living sacrifices, holy and acceptable to God,” not conformed to this world but transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:1–2). Would Jesus recognize that transformation in the media we choose to consume?

3. What would my community say? Discernment in our cultural habits should include a consideration of those around us. We don’t want to offend them with things we are free to consume, but which might be frustrating stumbling blocks to them. Also, it’s just a wise thing to consider the counsel of others rather than relying solely on one’s own judgment. As Proverbs 18:2 says, “Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions.” We shouldn’t isolate ourselves and privilege our own opinions about things. If others around us have thoughts about why something is or is not appropriate, maybe we should listen.

4. Is it good quality? If we’re going to be spending money, time and energy listening to music, watching a movie or consuming some other item in culture, why not focus on the highest quality we can find? Sure, there’s a time and a place for “escapist” fare, but a diet of 100 percent Katy Perry and Jerry Bruckheimer does not do a body good. A key aspect of a healthy Christian consumption is the ability to recognize and then support the most excellent and creative content we can find, however subjective such determinations might be. Discernment is not just about avoiding too many F-words or overly nihilistic themes. It’s also about avoiding the trite, cheap and clichéd and instead seeking out the best.

5. Is it edifying? This sounds like something Focus on the Family might ask. But it’s a solid question. Paul tells Christians to rid themselves of “anger, rage, malice, slander and filthy language from your lips” (Colossians 3:8), which isn’t to say we should avoid any media that depicts such things, just that we should beware of such influences tarnishing our character and eroding our witness as God’s chosen people. We are to set our hearts and minds “on things above, not on earthly things” (Colossians 3:1–2), and to dwell on whatever is true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent or praiseworthy (Philippians 4:8). If we can’t find any of those redeemable attributes in the culture we are consuming, we should question whether it’s worthwhile.

You Are What You Consume

Ultimately, the question of what you consume in culture, and how you go about it, says a lot about what you value and the type of person you want to be. Do you want to be the person who is always pushing the boundaries, consuming culture recklessly and rebelliously without ever engaging it on a deep level? Do you want to be the person who legalistically avoids all culture out of fear or apathy, refusing to dig into the trenches of discernment and, as a result, misses out on the goodness, truth and beauty that can be found? Or, do you want to be someone who is caught up in the desire to be more Christ-like, to know Him more, to testify to His glory through the manner in which you engage the culture in His world?

As a people charged with the task of being salt and light (Matthew 5:13–16), a “royal priesthood” called out of darkness and into light (1 Peter 2:9), Christians must consider how our consumer choices contribute or detract from this vocation. What is communicated about our identity and values via our consumer behavior? If a Christian is seen at church one minute and seen throwing money away at a casino or guzzling cheap beer at a kegger the next, what does that communicate?

When we start looking at culture in a deeper way, the bounds of what can facilitate our worship are greatly expanded.

On the other hand, if we consume culture in a thoughtful, healthy manner, we both reflect the grandeur of God’s creation back to Him in worship and to the world around us as witness.

The manner in which Christians engage culture is too important to get wrong. It’s lamentable that throughout so much of Christian history, we have approached it so simplistically, and often in reaction to whatever end of the spectrum the previous generation favored.

When God created culture, He said it was “very good.” Yet the fall of man complicated things, making culture a realm that is as full of the bad, false and ugly as it is of the good, true and beautiful. Still, there are vestiges of “very good” everywhere, and it behooves Christians to work to discern, discover and champion it whenever they can.

I once heard the Eastern Orthodox bishop Kallistos Ware define the Christian as “the one who, wherever he looks, sees Christ everywhere.” I don’t think he meant the Christian sees Jesus’ face on tortillas. Rather, I think the bishop was getting at the same thing C.S. Lewis was expressing when he famously said “I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen, not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.” It’s what Abraham Kuyper was getting at when he said “there is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: ‘Mine!’” It’s the idea that Christ illuminates and animates all things; that our enjoyment of culture is both justified and amplified by His Incarnation.

It’s the reason there is so much at stake in this question of how we consume culture. It’s a way for us to seek and honor our Creator, even while we enjoy His creation. It’s a statement to the world that yes, Christians care about culture. We care about it so much, in fact, that we’re not going to just consume it recklessly or indiscriminately, or to prove a point. Rather, we will consume culture carefully, thoughtfully, joyfully and worshipfully. Which is to say: Christianly.

This article is partially adapted from the book Gray Matters: Navigating the Space Between Legalism & Liberty (Baker, 2013), by Brett McCracken

11 Comments

Larry Shallenberger

9

Larry Shallenberger commented…

I think this is a decent starting point, but incomplete.

One additional question regarding the cultural artifact might be, "Does it help me understand a truth about the way the world works?"

Part of understanding how the world works, would be to admit that a piece of illustrates the Fall. I believe Relevant ran a few positive articles on Breaking Bad in this regard.

A second question-- and I admit the author alluded to it-- would be pointed toward the person experiencing the art. "Will I passively consume or will I appreciate and study the cultural artifact?"

I'd suggest the Christian with the studious eye has the freedom to delve deeper into the culture than the one who doesn't.

Nate Ransil

1

Nate Ransil commented…

My ideas on this are not fully baked, but I'd welcome some discussion... While I like where this article wants us to be -- effectively living in the middle of the road, instead of swerving off into the ditches of legalism or license -- at what point does this too become reactionary and formulaic? What I mean is, if we are in either of those ditches as a reaction (oversimplified to "don't be a heathen" or "don't be a legalist") it seems like this article is advocating reacting to both, by keeping the pendulum in the center, and helps us by giving us some questions, to help us think through decisions. But how then does this list of questions not just become another formula, helping us to behave more thoughtfully than the ditch dwellers, but still working off a list nonetheless? Is this what scripture means when it says we should be led by the Spirit? Is it that easy that we can boil it down to a 5 question matrix, and at what point does the Spirit become (or remain) irrelevant? Your thoughts?

TC Larson

1

TC Larson commented…

Nate, I'm with you in that my ideas are not hard set, but my instinct is that many Christians are looking for a formula, for faith and for relating to the world. Having that formula is easier than working through it themselves. I just don't know that Jesus provides one. The five question matrix seems like a decent starting point, as Larry mentioned, but I think it is simplistic. I like to consider how things affect my thinking and behaviors. Does watching something help me understand the nuances of a particular viewpoint, make me aware of how someone else approaches life? Does listening to a particular form of music reveal God at work behind the scenes, however unwittingly? I think there is beauty and truth everywhere. Sometimes it takes extra attention to notice it when it comes from an unexpected source. That being said, I don't relate well to violence, cruelty, or graphic sex - - these things trouble my spirit, and so I choose not to expose myself to them. I believe this is my version of listening to the prompting of the Holy Spirit in this area, and it might look different for me than it does for someone else. Not very tidy, I know, but over time I'm discovering that following Jesus is never very tidy.

Tiribulus

2

Tiribulus commented…

Mr. McCracken,
I am challenging you to literally put your money where your mouth is and publicly debate me online on whether a biblical case can be made for the consumption of nudity and sexual sin on a movie, tv or computer screen in the name of art and or cultural commentary. OR, suggest a by your standards qualified substitute such as Fred Sanders or anybody else you deem appropriate. It could be a leisurely "respond when you can" affair. My hope is that the scriptural Christian truth will prevail. I contend that you and any who support you are dishonoring the living God doing great and multi-generational harm to the body of Christ. I am not alone. There is no way you are so busy that you don't have probably a half hour a week to finally get yapping little pharisee terriers like me off your pant leg once and for all. Don't run away now. A silly stupid legalistic unknown simpleton with not even a tenth grade education should be an easy mark for a hip n sophisticated academic like you. Why don't we shake hands and pray that the Lord would have his way in a civilized exchange about this exceedingly important topic. Though important to me for entirely different reasons than it is to you. I don’t make my living rationalizing sin to the bride of Christ.

Come on. Why not?I’ll tell you why not. Because living in the age that we do, you have allllll the support you could ever hope for and nothing to gain by risking being thoroughly embarrassed in a biblical debate of this nature. Do you? It’s not that I’m brilliant Brett. It’s that you are very grotesquely wrong. In reading you around the web I can’t help sensing a glimmer of conscience left in you, gasping though it is under a constant diet of rank godless carnality.What a service this debate would be to the western church. To me it’s not about you and I and the best man winning. It’s about wether biblical Christian liberty includes what you say it does or if your worldview is a dangerous Satanic deception. I’d want to be sure about that if it were me. I don’t think you are. At least I hope not.
To the glory of the spotless Lamb of God,
Greg (Tiribulus) - Detroit
tiribulus@yahoo.com
http://tiribulus.net/wordpress/?p=109

Drew

1

Drew replied to Tiribulus's comment

wow. chill out man don't have a heart attack, if you honestly think anything in this article is "satanic deception" you're being ridiculous.

Nicholas Olsen

5

Nicholas Olsen replied to Drew's comment

Tribulus... You need to lay out something clear that Mr.Mckracken said that you disagree on in order to debate him. It's just manners to list the ideas that he expresses that you disagree, then a debate can take place.

Secondly, are you suggesting that Christian communities need to be a segregated culture that knows nothing of the world beyond its walls? Sounds a bit xenophobic if you ask me, but Jesus specifically told us to go into the "world" and make disciples.

My question to you is this... How does a Christian evangelize a person they don't know on any level? How does one accomplish this feat without knowing anything of their interests, values, music, politics, hobbies, job or way of life? What kind of real connection can you make with another person when you live in a community that almost never exposes you the pains and joys of "secular" life?

Ben Renkenberger

2

Ben Renkenberger commented…

"Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect." Matthew 5:48
If this is said by the One Who has “All authority in heaven and on earth..." then perfection is attainable. If we float through culture making 'wise' decisions about what movies we support through our money spent or if we are purchasing a song through any number of retailers, we are ultimately supporting the artists lifestyle. There are plenty of ways to live in the world but not be 'of the world' if we just look around. I don't think that these ways start with consuming alcohol just because 'we can.' I don't believe it means that we are permitted desecrate His temple by the things we put into it (smoke, food we know is processed in a way that does not honor His creation, media that if you look into the artist will find they are hardcore against God, etc.) but instead it means that we have to make the hard choice to do what is permissible or to ultimately withhold our fleshly desires from partaking in what is 'good enough' but instead we hold out for what is best--even perfect.
There is a wave that is overwhelming the moderate Christian that is relativism. This is not okay. "What is good for me may not be good for you," is the lazy way out. The only real redeeming quality to this article is not that it shoots for the middle but instead that it encourages us to prayerfully consider our consumerism.
As a youth minister, who is friends with a lot of folks that might agree with you, I am holding out for what is best in "love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control." (Galatians 5:22) I think this article used Scripture to encourage but also ignored the Bible's advice/commands by saying that moderation is king.
Just because we can, almost never means we should. There may be a myriad of reasons why we can but I challenge anyone to give me reasons why we should...
My reply is one sent in a holy hatred for sin starting in my own imperfect life. I am certain that Jesus only participated in some things with perfect ambitions/intentions so as to build relationships that would lead them to The Father but never just as a recreational, entertaining 'good time.'
That is where this article is pointing us: To be entertained because it is all of Jesus...Wrong. Find joy in what He made-not what the world, that is passing away, has come up with. Whether we are talking about music, movies, TV shows, or sports, God has called us to be different. He has set us apart; He has not thrown us to the wolves as wolves but instead as lambs...
Thanks for your time and I pray you can consider being 'relevant' is dangerously close to being 'of the world.'

Please log in or register to comment

Log In