The Socially Acceptable Sin

It’s everywhere in our society and churches, yet almost never talked about.

Most Christians today like to say that all sins are “equal” in the eyes of God, that there is no scale of less or worse sins, that a white lie or a homicide alike would have been enough to require Christ to die on the cross. We say this in theory, but in practice, we know that a white lie won’t get you kicked off the church leadership team. And a homicide likely will.

In practice, there are some sins that are socially acceptable, even in the Church. There’s one sin in particular that has pervaded our society and churches so silently we hardly give it a second thought, and that is the constant hunt for more over what is enough. Or, in an uglier terminology, what is known as gluttony.

When I think about gluttony, I think about my desire to shove a dozen donuts into my mouth and wash them down with chocolate milk. Or perhaps it’s my tendency to mindlessly feed chips to a stomach that’s no longer hungry. Many of us can look at the sin of gluttony and think, “That’s not really my struggle.” Or, we think, “What’s the big deal?” After all, most congregations have compulsive over-eaters among them, and they’re not considered “less spiritual” or “backslidden” for it.

But gluttony has never been merely an addiction to food. And if we look at it in its original definition and context, gluttony becomes far closer to home than we’d like to admit.

At its simplest, gluttony is the soul’s addiction to excess.

At its simplest, gluttony is the soul’s addiction to excess. It occurs when taste overrules hunger, when want outweighs need. And in America, where upsizing has always been part of the American dream, it’s often difficult to distinguish what is hard-earned achievement and what is indulgent excess. In this sense, even the most athletic and toned among us can be gluttons. Any of us can be.

All desire for excess stems from a lack of satisfaction. I’m not satisfied with my portion—be it the portion on my plate, in the marriage bed, or in my bank account. Because I’m not satisfied with my portion, I then seek a greater portion. But because every portion is a finite part of a finite whole, I am constantly chasing an excess that can never satisfy.

This is the story of Genesis 3. What was the sin in the Garden of Eden if not a desire for excess? Adam and Eve were given beautiful sights and beautiful tastes in the absence of shame, but what made the garden a paradise was not any of this. It was a paradise because God walked in the cool of the day with them. And yet, Adam and Eve’s downfall was because they deemed even this as not enough. They weren’t content with their portion of paradise, and they reached out—to disastrous consequence—for more.

Like them, we are ravenous beings. We embody bottomless cravings that constantly paw at the next attractive thing. Our appetites are as strong as death, Proverbs 27:20 tells us. We are always on the move for the next thing that can satisfy and slake our restless thirst. This endless pull is the engine of gluttony. It propels our souls ever toward excess.

And yet, the desire for “more” is not inherently bad, but it is often misdirected. What we need is a relentless appetite for the divine. We need a holy ravenousness. Our craving souls can turn and become enthralled by a goodness that is found in the presence of an all-glorious God. There is only one infinite source of satisfaction that can satisfy our bottomless cravings.

A taste of His supreme grace is enough to lure an appetite long held prisoner to lesser portions. If stolen water is sweet, lavished grace is sweeter.

And here’s a strange side effect: The more we drink deeply of the endless love of an infinite God, the more our tastes will be changed. The deep bright marrow of grace will drip down into the restless souls of the ever-hungry.

The desire for “more” is not inherently bad, but it is often misdirected. What we need is a relentless appetite for the divine. We need a holy ravenousness.

In pursuit of lesser portions, our tastes have dulled. We’ve become numb to our real hungers, filling them with lesser fare. But when we return to the source, we taste anew.

Psalm 34:8 challenges us to see the difference for ourselves: “Taste and see that the Lord is good.” I think Paul understood this verse when he told the people at Lystra that God gives food and gladness so that our hearts would turn from vain things and turn to the ultimate satisfaction of who God is (Acts 14:15-17).

Consequently, if God has ordained that His goodness can be tasted and seen (and, I would submit, heard, smelled and touched), this has at least two direct implications. First, it means that every finite pleasure and satisfaction is meant to point us toward the infinite pleasure and satisfaction of God. My admiration for a sunset, then, need not stop at that horizon, rather it can curve upward into praise and gratitude. Second, it means that if our desire for "more" is misplaced, then certainly it can be redirected to something good as well.

Is the desire for excess sinful? It depends on whether the soul is addicted to a finite excess or an infinite excess. Do we ever think of gorging on God? Do we relish the chance to spend a few more minutes in prayer, hidden away from the world for just one more taste of the divine? When was the last time we lingered long over the pages of an open Bible because we just couldn’t stop admiring the honeyed flavor of an ancient truth? If the Bible is the story of the only infinite good, why do we spend so much of our lives at lesser tables?

We Christians have so tamed our enjoyment in God that we cannot fathom what such thrill-seeking would even look like. Feasting on God is as foreign to most Americans as an empty stomach. Why can’t we fix our souls on the only goodness who can handle our cravings? Why do we chase the more mild flavors of money, food and sex?

If only we would not stifle our gluttonous cravings, but turn them in the right direction. If only we would feast on an infinite God who offers fullness of life, rather than these lesser tables with the far milder flavors of money, sex, food and power.

As George MacDonald put it, “Sometimes I wake and, lo, I have forgot.” Sleep is like a reset button and my hunger is misdirected often. I think I’m hungry for the finite, but I’m really hungry for God. To remember, we need to taste daily, deeply and constantly of the goodness of God. So let us turn together, and feast rightly.

119 Comments

Jesse Arnold McDowell

2

Jesse Arnold McDowell commented…

I agree with this article on the main point, that gluttony has gone un-addressed in the church. The Platonist / Dantean thought that one's desire should be directed to God certainly has been portrayed well. The rejoicing souls reaching the peak of Mount Purgatory sang the songs of Redemption because they desired to be in the midst of God. Such goes ancient and Medieval thought (I'm sure McDonald agrees with you).

And while one's hunger for God can be satisfied in the silent pages of the Bible, God's artwork has been invested in connection with other humans rather than isolation from them. I doubt that this article meant to put forth only one solution to battle gluttony (and all ideas of it) but an alternative to the only one in the article would be social connection. After all, doesn't everyday life engender the opportunity for virtue? Doesn't Jesus exhort his people to spread the established Kingdom? You are right when you say that satiation may very well be the downfall of modern church-goers, but the more compelling solution that I would accept and that I think scripture is concerned with is writing a narrative that connects us with the world and its people. This, paired with contemplative solitude with scripture and active prayer life, reveals somewhat of all who God is.

Michael Lucero

30

Michael Lucero commented…

I feel like this is an issue where we as a culture in this age is weaker to this sin than Christians were in past ages. Because this *was* seen as a big deal in ancient and especially medieval periods, it was something that Christians were vocal and active about developing resistance and self control about. In the reaction against everything medieval, this along with many other things has been thrown to the wayside, and is seen as no longer important. I'm not trying to make any sort of primitivist argument; I'm just saying that it's interesting, the way we think of the tide of history as always moving forward, when there are many ways in which we regress rather than progress.

Tricia Rousseau

1

Tricia Rousseau commented…

Thank you. I needed to hear this right now at this time. Praise be to God for the work He is sculpting of this jagged piece of clay He calls chosen.

Barbara Brooks

9

Barbara Brooks commented…

Many of us have no idea how to plan meals and eat in a healthy way. It would be so wonderful if some of the older couples in the church could teach those who don't know how to prepare and plan simple, tasty meals and sit down to eat with others. I really feel that eating alone and depending on prepared food contributes to the poor food choices and gluttony. If you don't have nice people to dine with and encourage you, then you're likely to stuff yourself to feel your emotional emptiness. I don't think people were any more godly in the 1960's, yet there was much less obesity and gluttony, and I think it was due to people preparing meals at home, bringing lunches to work and school and sitting down at the table to eat with others.

Victoria Lee

1

Victoria Lee commented…

This puts a lot of perspective into my line of vision. I have always struggled with spending time in the word. I need to dive deep into Gods word and then that will help change the rest of my life.

Please log in or register to comment

Log In