By Jenny Rae Armstrong
March 8, 2013
Jenny Rae Armstrong is an award-winning freelance journalist who blogs about faith, social justice and women’s issues at www.jennyraearmstrong.com. She is passionate about building up the body of Christ by building up women, in her rural community and around the world. She loves making new friends, so drop by her blog and say hi, or follow her on Twitter or Facebook.
In 2011, Barna released findings that shook people’s assumptions about religious life in America. Women, traditionally considered the more spiritual sex, were leaving the Church faster than men. A requisite month or so of uproar followed. Experts dissected the research, the blogosphere exploded and various theological traditions were blamed for the exodus.
A few provocateurs claimed it was a necessary correction, blaming "the feminization of the church" for the demise of Western Christianity. Then a book was released on the subject: Jim Henderson’s The Resignation of Eve: What if Adam's Rib Is No Longer Willing to Be the Church's Backbone?
Henderson’s zinger of a title summed up the problem. The church has always relied heavily on the contributions of women, from the female disciples who traveled with Jesus and funded His ministry out of their own means to the nameless grandmother who showed up early to brew the coffee you swigged down before church last week. But women are growing increasingly disenchanted with the Church, and even when they do show up, they’re sure not going to brew your coffee. Female volunteerism plunged 31 percent over the past 20 years.
The fact that a growing number of committed Christian women are fading quietly into the pews, then out the back door, should concern us.
“Well, of course,” you may be thinking. “Women have careers now. They don’t have time for all that stuff.” And even though women did, in fact, have careers back in the early nineties, there is some truth to that. Today’s women are too busy to throw themselves into unpaid church work the way their grandmothers did, even if they wanted to. Which, it seems, they don’t.
Henderson names this movement in The Resignation of Eve as an “epidemic of quiet, even sad resignation among dedicated Christian women who are feeling overworked and undervalued in the church.”
It’s not so much that women feel the Church doesn’t value the contributions they do make; it’s that they don’t see opportunities or don’t feel the freedom to bring their whole selves to the table.
Younger women especially have a hard time reconciling the opportunities the secular world affords them with the limitations they face in the Church. Uncertain about whether the Church would consider their gifts, education and abilities an acceptable offering from a female, and not wanting to create controversy, many women consciously or subconsciously side-step the issue. They opt to minimize their church involvement and pour the best of their energies into their careers. Besides, what’s a marketing consultant supposed to do on the decorating committee, anyway?
And then there’s that pesky detail about needing to earn a living. Fifty years ago, it wasn’t uncommon for ministry-minded homemakers to volunteer 10-plus hours a week at the church down the street. The pastor’s wife was practically on staff, expected to provide leadership and pastoral care to the women of the church. Church provided an outlet for women to use their gifts, but as the secular world held out opportunities that eclipsed the church’s stained-glass ceiling, volunteer work became less of a priority. Churches compensated by hiring staff—specifically, male staff. The gulf between professional and lay ministry widened, and women were left with fewer female leaders to look to as role models, or go to for counsel and encouragement. The pastor’s wife had her own career to manage, and the respected Sunday School teacher’s daughter was too busy teaching ethics at the local college to take up her mother’s mantle.It isn’t all gloom and doom, of course. These trends have resulted in many positive changes as well, but the fact that a growing number of committed Christian women are fading quietly into the pews, then out the back door, should concern us.
The body of Christ requires a balance of male and female leadership to remain whole and healthy. To allow one half of the body to atrophy while the other carries the weight (whether it’s men or women doing the heavy lifting) results in a lopsided image of the Church that is frightful to behold.
So, what can the Church do to let women know they are welcomed and needed just as they are, and to empower female leaders for ministry?
The body of Christ requires a balance of male and female leadership to remain whole and healthy.
First of all, we can respect women’s education, experience and career obligations, instead of expecting them to fill traditionally female roles. If the CEO of the local bank loves making cupcakes for the Women's Banquet, fine, but it sure wouldn’t hurt to ask her to chair the finance board. And don’t grumble about the oncologist not taking her turn in the nursery rotation. Humility is great, and every church needs people to make the coffee, dust the pews and staff the nursery, but if you’re constantly tapping women for kitchen work while passing them over for roles that might be a better fit, don’t be surprised if they feel undervalued.
Second, male leaders can intentionally seek out female input. Women have an incredible wealth of wisdom, insight and parallel perspectives to offer the Church and the world—as men do. Imagine what the Church could look like if it paired the contributions of both together. And pastors, many of the women in your congregation are just waiting to be asked. Be intentional about including women among your advisors, and prodding for female attendees' perspectives.
Last but not least, churches can hire women. About half of the students in seminary nowadays are women, which makes a powerful statement about women’s desire to bring their whole heart, mind and strength to Christ's service in the Church. Even churches that are big on male leadership should be able to see the benefit of having called, gifted and theologically educated women on staff to minister to other women. There are some things women simply don't want to talk about with a male pastor, and that a man will not be able to speak to like a woman can.
It is not good for man to be alone, and that holds just as true in the church board room as it does in the family. Let's work on building a church that isn't just hushing one side to hear the other, but where both men and women are encouraged to bring their whole selves to the table, using every gift God has given them for the sake of the Kingdom to the glory of God.




58 Comments
1
Abigail Visco Rusert commented…
I am a female pastor, married to a male pastor. We work in different churches, mainly because we are different denominations. I think this article speaks to a lot of women who are like me. There is one comment that talks about encouraging women to fill a Titus 2 role. I agree that it's unfortunate that our society can often look down on women for choosing to stay home. That being said, the church has done a great job at defending women who make that choice (to stay home) for years. What the church hasn't often done is learn how to work with those of us who sense a call to something different- any kind of full-time (even part-time!) paid position. The other pastor at my church is a man, and he was very intentional about encouraging the church to hire a female pastor precisely so that we could compliment each other in our ministry to the wider congregation. Mothers, stay-at-homers and "career" women have often found themselves coming to me for pastoral care before they'd approach the other pastor. There are some men with whom I've worked on boards or committees that I am also better able to relate to. All in all, the model for ministry that Armstrong is envisioning can be done- and women of all kinds (homemakers and "career" women) can find their gifts being used.
18
Mike Page commented…
Few things one this one:
As mentioned in another comment, Relevant really messed up again with the title of the article. There have been a handful of these over the past couple of weeks that are misleading in the title of the article.
People are right in that the author is drawing a line that I do not think the survey shows of a causal link between woman's equality and woman leaving the church. The article is provocative, but you need to make a better case than is done here. Maybe the size limitations of on-line blogging hurt that effort.
Some words have many meanings as well. Namely the use of the word "gift". The article and many of the comments use it in regards to what I would call talents (well educated, handles money well, good speaker, etc.). However, the gifts that Scripture talks about are uniquely different in that they are empowerings the Holy Spirit gives (prophecy, mercy, serving, etc.). In regards to the spiritual gifts, the Scripture is quite clear you should not be preventing anyone, man or woman from using those gifts.
Lastly, by and large, most churches allow women into almost all roles, except that of a pastor/elder. And that is almost exclusively due to their interpretation of Scripture in regards to the role of women. We have to be VERY careful not to make equality of worth the same thing as equality of role. Most churches that do not allow women to be pastors is not because a room full of bigoted men are trying to figure out ways to keep women "in their place" or something similar. It is due to the belief in the authority of Scripture and its revelation of the nature of God: that God is a unity of persons that have the same value but different roles. When you mix up worth and roles you will get a angry mess of protests for this reason.
2
Shalanah Dawson replied to Mike Page's comment…
I love it. A woman can have a gift to be a CEO but could never have the spiritual gift for leadership in a church. I love how logic is lost when it comes to female and male equality within the church. It is break in logic that women leave.
2
Peg Roy commented…
Reply to Mike Page:
It is good of you to point out that "the Scripture is quite clear you should not be preventing anyone, man or woman from using those gifts." Spiritual gifts do not come in hues of pink and blue. And all too often this is the case as certain Pauline writings are interpreted in this way and women are restricted from using their spiritual gifts for the sake or benefit of the entire church and world and from fulfilling God's calling to ministry especially in the area of church leadership. There is also wide spread interpretation of Scripture regarding roles for women and roles for men where it is not addressing roles. In fact, Scripture has very little if anything to say about roles and gender. My experience in the church over the past 50+ years is that it's practice and orthodoxy is unknowingly and strongly influenced by and a reflection of cultural norm and ancient philosophy rather than being determined by and a beautiful reflection of Jesus, our risen Savior and the Head of the church, His body.
1
Pamela Pepper Tennant commented…
Amen! I have volunteered and feel so underused. I have 3 years of pastoral training and been in ministry since I was 3-42 yrs, and many pastoral positions. I am in a younger, male dominated church, I look like I'm 30 but feel like my sex and age are a huge reason. I have much to offer and a huge vision. I know as I continue to pray and fast that God will open doors.
2
Shalanah Dawson commented…
I had a friend that did a ton of free video work for my church, filming and editing, for years. Then when it came time to hire someone, and she applied as well, they picked a man that didn't go to the church. It just summed up everything wrong with church. How many slave women hours have paid for the church and its male employees?
Connect OR Connect
Please log in or register to comment