Login/Register

Friend Activity

Most Popular

Most Popular

TV Blog

The back story of CBS’s Person of Interest is that a post-9/11 U.S. government commissioned an independent contractor to create technology that would help to identify terrorists, allowing law enforcement officers to prevent crimes. Finch (Michael Emerson) is the independent contractor who created this technology. However, it has one unfortunate flaw. Initially, it identifies all crimes, not just those of national concern. Consequently, Finch has to program the technology he created to separate crimes in two lists: relevant (national in scope) and irrelevant (personal in scope). Even though the “irrelevant list” is wiped clean daily, Finch is still haunted by the people he knows are involved in crimes he does nothing to stop. When he expresses this discomfort to a colleague, the colleague responds: “We didn’t build this to save someone. We built it to save everyone.”

Read more...

Picking favorites from the new shows premiering during the approaching fall television season is like playing the stock market. No one ever really knows which offerings are going to take off and which ones will tank until it happens. But I have to risk it—the prediction of which new television series will be worth your time, the total humiliation of being wrong when my picks only last four episodes or just turn out to be really stupid, the inevitability of your complete disagreement. Absolutely! Without the risk, the fun of watching on each premiere night is so one-dimensional.

In light of all of this, I’ve made a list: my best guesses of the best new shows this fall. The list includes prime-time offerings from Sunday through Thursday. I recommend you take Friday and Saturday evenings off from TV. You really won’t miss much.

Read more...

Toward the end of college, I wasn’t sure what I wanted to do with my life—original, I know. But I wasn’t completely sold on the field that my undergraduate major made the obvious choice, and suddenly, I wanted a greater challenge. I wanted to know and push what I was capable of. During that time, I contemplated going to law school. That lasted for about three weeks until I came to my senses and realized I love writing in a way I will never love law and enrolled in communication school. I still think about law school from time to time in a “maybe later if someone else is paying” kind of way; but watching USA Network’s Suits has almost cured me of even that.

Suits is yet another slick and entertaining drama that USA does so well. The show primarily follows the story of Mike Ross (Patrick J. Adams), a hard-working first-year law associate with a photographic memory who never attended law school and the successful attorney, Harvey (Gabriel Macht), who takes a chance by hiring him. The catch is: Everyone else at the law firm where they work has to believe that Mike not only went to law school but graduated from Harvard, no less. The structure of the show centers on the internal workings of the law firm with specific cases being secondary plot threads. I have learned that law (at least TV law), among professions, can be particularly cutthroat, especially for struggling associates and partners ... and those who want to be partners ... and paralegals who believe they would be better lawyers ... and legal secretaries who do so much work with no guarantee of respect. OK, so it’s cutthroat for pretty much everybody. Like I said, I’m almost cured of even thinking of it as a distant option.

Still, Suits has made me wonder how Mike Ross has lasted this long in the charade. He has almost been caught an unrealistic number of times without actually being caught. Sure, his memories of Harvard Law have a few strategic holes in them, but he covers so well. If his previous career was as a professional test taker for other people, so far the overwhelming response has been, “So what?” Viewers have to wonder how long he can continue to circumvent the rules and evade discovery by all of his coworkers not to mention the legal system.  

It’s even more puzzling to consider what the experience will be worth to Mike if/when he is found out. He will likely lose most of his connections, both personal and professional, with his co-workers. He will likely lose his job, and with it, any opportunity of advancing in the law profession. All that’s left are a few paychecks—better-than-average paychecks in a struggling economy, yes. But still, is it worth it?

For now, Mike somehow continues to keep up a decent impression of a mostly decent lawyer. If the events portrayed in Suits were real, he would probably be in the hospital with an ulcer from the stress of the fundamental lie that is supporting the rest of his life.

In John 8:32, the Bible says “the truth will set you free.” I have found this to be true on two different levels. First, when we hold to Jesus as Truth, we are set free spiritually. As an outflow of that freedom, when we make the truth our policy in our daily lives, we are free from the weight of maintaining a web of lies—and free from the consequences of inevitably getting caught in it.


Rachel Decker writes a bi-weekly column about television for
RELEVANT magazine. Check out her blog at http://racheldeckerspeaks.com.  Follow her on Twitter: @rdeckerspeaks.

About a year ago, a couple of readers commented on my RELEVANT magazine summer television viewing recommendations asking why I had left out ABC’s Wipeout. I’m not going to lie: At first I dismissed the show as mindless television viewing at its best (which it is) and couldn’t imagine ever writing about it. But since the day that comment was posted, I’ve been thinking about it, trying to rise to the writing challenge that is Wipeout. Just like many of the show’s contestants, I have bounced off the idea in every conceivable direction, unsure of how to approach Wipeout, and written a dozen other columns in the meantime.

Read more...

For the past four years, Michael Westen (Jeffrey Donovan) has been looking for answers on USA Network’s Burn Notice. Piece by piece, he has worked his way up the ladder through all the middlemen. With every achievement, his desperation for an explanation as to why his life has been turned upside down has increased. This week, in the season five summer premiere, he got to the one person left who could finally give him his answers. Despite his emotional need for answers, he held it together through interrogation, planning, execution (complete with explosives) and the resourceful getaway we have come to love and expect from him. He didn’t just want answers; he needed them. And we thought that this time he was going to get them.

Michael spent the last four years of his life in a holding pattern, and finally reached the person who could answer his questions—only to find that person dead. For all his resourcefulness, this dead end was unexpected. Now we know there is no more need to pursue answers. The past is gone and everything that was normal before may never be normal again. Michael can only move ahead into whatever the next phase of his life will be. The real question that remains is, what will he do with it?

We’ve all been there; not as burned spies, perhaps. But we’ve all wondered why we didn’t get into the college we really wanted to go to, why we didn’t get that great job or promotion, why that relationship didn’t work out or why that friend or relative got sick, died or just walked out of our lives. These are the hard questions. If we haven’t already asked them, we will at some point. As we wrestle with them over and over again, there is usually another question that follows: Why did I work so hard or invest so much time if this was never going to work out? We think we could move on if we just knew why.

One of the most difficult and hated truths about life is that a lot of us don’t get our answers—and it’s not for lack of effort in trying to find them. We, like Michael Westen, may very well spend years looking for answers about our past that we deeply need. We’re just on the verge of getting them, only to find that all we will get to soothe our pain is the assurance that the past is the past and the future is ours for the making.

As far as I know, there is no formula for slogging through all the unanswered questions in life. There are two major options: We can either get tangled up in our questions, or find a way to move forward in spite of them. The exact path to moving forward may vary for each of us, depending on where we need to heal and what we need to lay aside. But whatever it takes, I hope we each find our way forward rather than missing the rest of our lives while we are waiting for answers.

Rachel Decker writes a bi-weekly column about television for RELEVANT magazine. Check out her blog at http://racheldeckerspeaks.com/.

USA Network’s Covert Affairs is a fast-paced thrill ride spy drama with noticeable production ties to The Bourne Identity. High-speed entertainment, no question. This week’s season two premiere found Annie Walker (Piper Perabo) trying to protect an Eastern European professional women’s tennis player with much running, shooting and hyper-aggressive driving. However, even in all that, there was one moment to slow down and consider.

Read more...

Are you ready for some reruns? As a television columnist, I hate this time of year—this week in particular. The spring finales have just passed. The summer premieres have yet to arrive, and even with those, our television choices throughout the summer are greatly limited by reruns.

Read more...

“Here’s the deal,” I said to my roommate, Aaron. “I’ll sit here and watch this with you, but for every five minutes that I don’t laugh, I get to eat one of your Oatmeal Cream Pies.”

Read more...

For the purpose of this column, I am going to assume all of you who wished to have already taken in coverage of the royal wedding this past weekend. I know you've had enough opportunities to learn even the most insignificant details. If you somehow missed it, a) Where have you been?, and b) Visit hulu.com. Yes, it even infiltrated Hulu...

Read more...

Have you ever felt like making amends is too easy? I have. Of course, I don’t usually feel like I get off easy when I have to confess and make restitution for a wrong I have done. I want it to be easy then, but when it’s someone else … that’s another issue. When it’s someone else, I tend to think, however wrong the thought may be, that gaining forgiveness should range in difficulty based on the wrong committed.

Read more...