By Joshua Wise
July 25, 2012
Joshua Wise is an Episcopal PhD Student of Systematic Theology at Catholic University of America. His study focuses on addressing modern theological issues including Soteriology, Christology, and video games in dialogue with the ancient church, especially the Greek Fathers. His work includes the website The Cross and The Controller and the podcast No Avatars Allowed. His work has been featured on Kotaku and he currently writes for Warp Zoned. He blogs weekly here.
The Space Trilogy, by C.S. Lewis, is perhaps for adults what the Narnia series is for children. It is the transformation of the classical genera story into something new. Whereas the tales of Aslan are classic fairy stories all shot through with the light of the new life of Christ, The Space Trilogy is the science fiction epic subjected to the same treatment. Where Narnia asks what the Word of God would look like in a world of animals, The Space Trilogy asks what our own universe looks like if we question some of our basic modern assumptions.
The series is, admittedly, strange. Instead of following a single character or group of characters through all three books, the first two feature Professor Elwin Ransom on his adventures to two different planets in our solar system. The third book focuses on Jane and Mark Studdock, an academic couple who end up falling on opposite sides of a conflict involving the dystopian events surrounding Bracton College, a sinister corporation, and a mysterious figure dug up from the bottom of a well. By all accounts, it isn’t your standard science fiction series.
Lewis, who reportedly wrote the series as part of a deal with J.R.R. Tolkien (who is supposedly to have written a time travel story as his end of the agreement), uses the trilogy to write a fantasy from his own unique perspective. The same medieval Christian elements that inform Narnia are here, but function on a much more adult level. The adventures are rooted, as much as they can be, in the real world so that Lewis could confront what he saw as misconceptions of his age. What had been, in the Middle Ages, “The Heavens,” had become in his day merely “space.” Science, not reason, had become the master of thought. Utilitarian ideas of goodness reigned. Lewis’ situation was clearly not much different than our own.
“Space” is once more “the heavens” as it teams with the powers and intelligences that all serve the One who made the universe.
The series also confronts some serious philosophical issues in the last book, That Hideous Strength. What does it mean for something to have value? What does it mean for people to step completely outside of traditional values? This should not be confused with the modern rhetoric about “traditional values” that specifically target the meaning of adult relationships. Instead, Lewis is concerned about a larger picture. What does it mean for something to be beautiful? What does it mean for something to be good? Can we say, without nonsense, that a sunset is majestic? What do the people look like who abandon all values whatsoever? Here he is echoing work he did in his non-fiction book, The Abolition of Man, in which he paints a very bleak future for a humanity which abandons all concepts of value. His fiction serves to give life to that vision in a way that makes one truly appreciate the man’s gifts. What he can convincingly show through logical argument, he can also masterfully show in fiction.
These more heady topics make the series something of an anomaly. They are not written for children, and do not function in any way as allegories. They are, to be precise, scientific fiction romances (in the old sense of the word). hey draw on theology, philosophy, medieval writers, and the tales of King Arthur. They make arguments about the nature of humanity, the nature of the earth, and sin. They touch on topics as far ranging as pacifism, spiritual warfare and abortion. It is perhaps for this reason that they have not been as well read as the Narnia books, or Mere Christianity and The Screwtape Letters. They are thoroughly weird.
The mastery of these books is that they are not merely good Christian fiction, but good fiction.
The mastery of these books is that they are not merely good Christian fiction, but good fiction. They draw on a wealth of Lewis’ own reading and love of the science fiction story, with a good mixture of medieval and spiritual material. Modern readers who grew up with the Narnia books may find that what they loved in Aslan, they will also love in Maleldil the Young.
As a final word, it is also interesting to note that The Space Trilogy technically takes place in the same universe as The Lord of the Rings. A note at the beginning of That Hideous Strength as well as certain references to Numenor reveal the events to be connected, albeit very loosely, to Tolkien’s world. So for those who might like a connection to that great series, The Space Trilogy also offers this curious feature as well.




18 Comments
81,174
Kaimomo commented…
thanks for acknowledging one of the most enjoyable reading experiences I've ever had. Perelandra's my favorite book. Maybe I'm on the odd side because they never stuck me as weird.
81,174
Anonymous commented…
First read Perelandra in Freshman English in HS in 1981. Loved it although Inthink I prefer Out of the Silent Planel a little more
81,174
Brightie commented…
I have heard the same said of Till We Have Faces, so I become curious about our respective sources. :)
81,174
Brightie commented…
I liked the mishmash. I would hate to write an essay on it's structure and component elements, but it had a feeling of dream or nightmare to it which was delicious. And besides that... it seems as if we live in a world large enough to contain all of the above. Even in a world capable of dystopian inventions, I can look into the heavens and wish I knew they contained life, and I can dream of the wonder that myths and legends gave me as a child, and these things may not always feel disparate in my body. Do they need to be completely disparate in the body of a book? :)
81,174
Ecron Muss commented…
I don't think you are correct about the "same universe". I thought Tolkien was not happy that Lewis' named a place 'Numenor' when he had used the name 'Numinor'.
I think "the tales of Aslan are classic fairy stories" is an oversimplification too.
Even "weird" is a weird word. I thoughtOut of the Silent Planelsomewhat pedestrian when I read it, Perelandra was more coherent and That Hideous Strength was a complete change in writing style, demanding and adult (in the best sense of the word) in a way the first two were not. The influence of Lewis' friend Charles Williams on the last book is clear to anyone who has read any of Williams fiction.
Connect OR Connect
Please log in or register to comment